(r1) JMMCSearchCalReunionESOFeb2011 < Jmmc/Software

Tags: view all tags
---+!!<center>JMMC/ESO Calibrator Workgroup - Feb. 16 2011 / 14h-16h</center>

---++!! Participants 
<!--
|Main.XXX|%ICON{choice-no}%|
|Main.YYY|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
-->
|*Group Members*|*Attending*|
|Markus WITTKOWSKI|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Isabelle PERCHERON|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Klara SHABUN|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Main.OlivierChesneau|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Main.PierreCruzalebes|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Main.GillesDuvert|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Main.GuillaumeMella|%ICON{choice-yes}%|
|Main.SylvainLafrasse|%ICON{choice-yes}%|


---++!! Contact Informations
   * Grenoble
      * room : Belledone
      * server : visiolaog.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr (@IP 152.77.114.26)
      * phone : 00 33 476 635 508
      * contact : Sylvain Lafrasse (sylvain.lafrasse@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr)
   * Nice
      * room: new teleconf. room
      * server: IP 192.54.174.200
      * phone: ?
      * contact: Olivier Chesneau (Olivier.Chesneau@obs-azur.fr)
   * Garching
      * room : L130
      * phone : +49 89 3200 6669
      * contact : Markus Wittkowski (mwittkow@eso.org)
      * server: videoconf. will be initiated from here

---++!! Action Lists
%ACTIONSEARCH{ web=Jmmc.Software topic=JMMCSearchCalReunionESO?.*}%
[[Jmmc.JmmcSearchCalActionListArchive][Archived actions]]

---++!! Agenda
---+++ Status of the updates for the next release in June 2011
   * JMMC Catalogue
      * diam_vk values to be present for all stars, also for those that are present in the Borde or Merand catalogues;
      * fixing of the problem of "faulty diam_vk computed from wrong magnitudes coming from Bordé" mentioned in the email from S. Lafrasse, dated 3 Dec 2010 17:41:54;
      * addition of the MIDI consortium calibrator catalogue;
   * ESO CalVin Interface
      * fixing of a bug in the computation of the shadowing, and addition of delay line limits;
      * addition of the seeing-dependent limiting magnitude for AMBER;
      * enabling of the LST/HA option;
      * enabling of the search by visibility;

---+++ Discussion on possible longer-term improvements
Compared to our original science requirements document, the following items are not yet or not fully implemented. Should they ?

   * Spectral type, luminosity class, temperature, surface gravity, LMN magnitudes in the catalogue
      * information on quality as astrometric reference star;
      * information on quality as spectral calibrator (cf. Sect. 3 of the science requirements document);
   * Use of a bad calibrator list and feedback to the catalogue (cf. Sect. 3 of the science requirements document);
   * Information on previous observations and measured quality of a calibrator (cf. Sect. 4 of the science requirements document);
   * display of feasible LST range for science target and calibrators (also search for desired LST range) cf. Sects. 5&6;
   * "The new tool shall make use of modern visualizing capabilities and be designated with ease of use in mind" (cf. Sect. 7) Are we there ?

---+++ The science requirements document stated
   * "Strategy to find calibrators and to estimate their diameters shall be discussed and regularly revised" How do we do this ?

---+++ Short informal outlook on our collaboration?

-- Main.SylvainLafrasse - 16 Feb 2011
Topic revision: r1 - 2011-02-16 - SylvainLafrasse